Notebook

Notebook, 1993-

RELATIONSHIPS

Coherent Union of Parts


The word "organic" has many connotations, notably those involving biological and chemical phenomena. But it is used in our context to mean a particular physical quality: namely, the coherent union of parts invariably found in natural objects, but not always in those that are man-made. Most artists would agree that the creative mind is attracted to things organic. In fact many amass large collections of "found objects" which they constantly use as sources of inspiration. Why? There is a "rightness" inherent in the structure of natural things. That is, whether the shapes are regular or irregular in their configurations, an overall physical homogeneity manages to persist. They may be unbalanced, asymmetrical, and bizarre--altogether "unbeautiful" in a convectional sense---yet they still appear to be entire and whole in the rhythms, proportions, and directional movements of their various parts. There is a "fitness for purpose" about them which imparts a visual credibility to the form. These organic qualities, in other words, represent a design standard we seem to recognize intuitively as visually satisfying and functionally genuine. If a particular example is "classically" pleasing--that is, if it kindles our appreciation of an ordered and logical arrangement of parts in the way that the radial symmetry of the plant.... this is but one aspect of organic credibility, albeit one which gets high marks because such order and intelligibility appeals to reason.

On the other hand, we are surrounded by natural objects whose composite structures are anything but symmetrical and logical, and which possess a disproportionate and erratic grouping of parts that is the antithesis of classical balance and systematic juxtaposition. The thistle . . . . its very irregularity, erratic movements, and proportions give it a restless and vital plasticity, a physical unpredictability which renders it exciting and mysterious. To use another descriptive label, we might call it "romantically" --as opposed to classically--pleasing.

Note that an artist's interest in one of these two basic types of composite structure found in nature does not preclude an attraction to the other. Both regular and irregular organic structures appeal in their own right. However, a seeming paradox does exist: Creative minds often show a built-in tendency to "tidy up" nature--to simplify and reduce organic vitality in all natural objects so that they conform to the intellectual theories of mathematics and geometry. It is as if this endows them with a purity and consistency which nature itself lacks. Such an idea--or ideal--seems to be part of a general artistic impulse. For example, South American Indians strive for geometrical precision in painting designs on their ritual drums, apparently in the belief that the purer the design, the stronger the magic. Consequently I think we must accept the fact that art frequently tries to organize nature. Writing about art in Classical Greece, Aristotle remarked that, "the purpose of art is to realize nature's unrealized ends." Such a statement expresses the essence of Greek aestheticism.

We can, then, expect a wide range of artistic response to the stimulus provided by nature's variety of composite shapes. And the problems of designing--of organizing the layout of the several parts which make up the total work of art--reflect the diversity of the several parts which make up the total work of art--reflect the diversity of choice . . . . Following nature, the artist might favor:

Symmetrical and regular type of structural organization

Irregular, unsystematized, yet more vigorous and dramatic physique

The sort of composite personality the artist envisions depends upon the homogeneous or heterogeneous nature of the parts, on whether they lend themselves to a regular or freer type of grouping, and on personal preferences and taste at the time.

[Collier, Graham. Form, Space & Vision, An Introduction to Drawing and Design. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1985. pgs. 142-148]




NOTEBOOK | Links

Copyright

The contents of this site, including all images and text, are for personal, educational, non-commercial use only. The contents of this site may not be reproduced in any form without proper reference to Text, Author, Publisher, and Date of Publication [and page #s when suitable].